MSP Risk Has Evolved.

Your Tech E&O Policy Probably Hasn't.

65% of MSP policies we review contain material coverage gaps or structural misalignment.

The Shift

MSPs have evolved from endpoint support to automation-driven, multi-tenant security operators.
Most Tech E&O policies have not.

AI & Automation Blind Spots

Automation and AI-driven actions not explicitly covered

Where Policies Break

Identify and eliminate the hidden coverage gaps threatening your modern tech stack

Multi-tenant aggregation traps triggering multiple deductibles

Contractual liability misaligned with modern MSAs

Cyber and Tech E&O policies not coordinated via common carrier

Aggregation Exposure
MSA Liability Mismatch
Disconnected Cyber & Tech E&O
Insufficient Scale Limits

Limits sized for legacy IT, not platform-scale exposure

What Underwriters Reward

REDUCED PREMIUMS & REDUCED RETENTION

When MSP risk is properly structured and clearly presented to underwriting, mature operators are often seeing:

FEWER SUBLIMITS OF KEY COVERAGE

AUTOMATION AND AGENTIC AI ENDORSEMENTS

COORDINATED CYBER AND TECH E&O TRIGGER HIERARCHY

CLEAR AGGREGATION LANGUAGE FOR MULTI-CLIENT EVENTS

MSA review and alignment support

Insurance is only part of the structure.

Beyond the Policy

Contract-to-policy coordination

Client cyber insurance rollout to reduce third-party exposure

We Work With Your Agent

UKON partners with existing broker to modernize and align your Tech E&O and Cyber structure. No disruption. No broker replacement.

You Maintain The Relationship

Book An
MSP Risk Review Today

TECH E&O STRUCTURE vs. ACTUAL SERVICES

MSA ALIGNMENT AND CONTRACTUAL EXPOSURE

AGGREGATION AND AUTOMATION RISK

CLIENT CYBER COORDINATION OPPORTUNITIES