MSP Risk Has Evolved.

Your Tech E&O Policy Probably Hasn't.

65% of MSP policies we review contain material coverage gaps or structural misalignment.

The Shift

MSPs have evolved from endpoint support to automation-driven, multi-tenant security operators.
Most Tech E&O policies have not.

AI & Automation Blind Spots

Automation and AI-driven actions not explicitly covered

Where Policies Break

Identify and eliminate the hidden coverage gaps threatening your modern tech stack

Multi-tenant aggregation traps triggering multiple deductibles

Contractual liability misaligned with modern MSAs

Cyber and Tech E&O policies not coordinated

Aggregation Exposure
MSA Liability Mismatch
Disconnected Cyber & E&O
Insufficient Scale Limits

Limits sized for legacy IT, not platform-scale exposure

What Underwriters Reward

Reduced premiums

When MSP risk is properly structured and clearly presented to underwriting, mature operators are often seeing:

Automation and agentic AI endorsements

Clear aggregation language for multi-client events

Coordinated Cyber and Tech E&O trigger hierarchy

MSA review and alignment support

Insurance is only part of the structure.

Beyond the Policy

Contract-to-policy coordination

Client cyber insurance rollout to reduce third-party exposure

We Work With Your Agent

UKON partners with existing broker to modernize and align your Tech E&O and Cyber structure. No disruption. No broker replacement.

We Work With Your Existing Agent

The Offer

Tech E&O structure vs. actual services

MSA alignment and contractual exposure

Aggregation and automation risk

Client cyber coordination opportunities

A STRUCTURAL REVIEW